Our Indexes

The world's leading
independent volatility indexes.

Five precision-engineered indexes that strip away the distortions of legacy vol measures — giving you a clean, real-time read on what options are actually pricing.

📊
VolDex®
A better way to measure option volatility
VolDex® focuses on the options that matter most—at-the-money (ATM) options with near-term expirations—giving a cleaner, more accurate view of implied volatility.

By isolating these highly liquid and actively traded contracts, VolDex avoids the distortion caused by less relevant, far out-of-the-money options. The result is a more precise snapshot of market expectations for price movement and investor sentiment—without the noise.
Explore VolDex®
📈
CallDex®
A clearer signal of bullish sentiment & expected volatility
CallDex® tracks the cost of out-of-the-money call options to gauge market sentiment for the next 30 days. It uses call options that are one standard deviation out-of-the-money to measure what investors are expecting in terms of both volatility and potential price direction.

Higher CallDex values generally suggest traders are anticipating bigger moves or a possible market rally. Lower values indicate a calmer outlook or reduced interest in upside exposure.
Explore CallDex®
📉
PutDex®
Focused on downside risk pricing
PutDex® delivers a clear, strike-specific measure of implied volatility by concentrating on one key data point: the normalized cost of a 30-day, one standard deviation out-of-the-money (OTM) SPY put option.

This approach isolates the segment of the options market most directly associated with downside protection, removing the noise from less relevant strike prices. The result precisely indicates market sentiment around tail risk, hedging activity, and bearish positioning.

By zeroing in on these put options—widely used by institutional investors to protect against market declines—PutDex offers valuable insight into how much investors are willing to pay to insure against losses over the next month.
Explore PutDex®
⚖️
RiskDex®
A Clear Signal of Expected Market Direction
RiskDex® measures investor sentiment by comparing the normalized cost of 30-day, one standard deviation out-of-the-money (OTM) SPY put and call options. This simple ratio reveals whether the market is more focused on downside protection or upside opportunity — offering a direct view of expected equity direction over the next month.

Unlike traditional volatility indexes, which reflect overall price movement, RiskDex highlights directional bias. A rising RiskDex indicates OTM put prices are increasing at a faster rate than OTM call prices and suggests growing concerns about potential declines; a lower reading signals confidence or complacency.

This makes RiskDex a valuable tool for traders and risk managers seeking clarity on where the market thinks it's headed—not just how volatile it might be.
Explore RiskDex®
🦅
TailDex®
A smarter signal for downside risk & tail hedging demand
TailDex® measures the price of deep out-of-the-money put options to assess bearish sentiment and demand for tail risk protection over the next 30 days. By focusing on puts that are three standard deviations OTM, it reflects how concerned traders are about a major downside move, often called a 'tail event'.

Higher TailDex values suggest rising demand for crash protection or increased fear of large selloffs. Lower values imply a calmer market tone and less urgency to hedge against tail risk.
Explore TailDex®

How Much Was the Fed? — March 2023

Case Study · A Fed Week

Free to read

How Much Was the Fed? — March 2023

During the March 2023 banking stress, implied vol was high into an FOMC meeting. The useful question wasn't "is vol high?" — it was "how much of it is the Fed, and how much is the banks?"

Tier: ETF + EquitiesEvent: Mar 22, 2023 FOMCUnderlying: SPYReading time: 5 min

The March 2023 FOMC is the perfect case for event isolation, because two sources of volatility were stacked on top of each other: a genuine, ongoing banking scare (diffusive) and a high-stakes scheduled decision (the event). A single implied number couldn't tell them apart. The deconstruction could.

The setup

In the days after Silicon Valley Bank failed (March 10, 2023), implied vol on the index jumped as a real, unscheduled crisis played out — the kind of background fear that lives in the diffusive baseline. On top of that sat the FOMC decision of March 22: would the Fed keep hiking into a banking panic? That's a classic scheduled event. The reading was high for both reasons at once.

Fri, Mar 10, 2023

SVB fails; banking stress erupts. Diffusive baseline jumps — this is real, unscheduled fear, not a calendar event.

Mar 13 → Mar 21

Crisis simmers into the meeting. Total implied is very high: elevated baseline plus a fat FOMC event chunk stacked on top.

Wed, Mar 22, 2023

Fed hikes 25 bp and signals caution. The event resolves; the FOMC chunk crushes out — but the baseline stays elevated because the banking story isn't over.

Late March

As stress fades, the baseline itself reverts. The two pieces normalize on different clocks.

Stacked: banking baseline + FOMC event into the meetingafter the meeting baselineFOMC baseline (still high) FOMC crushed out

Illustrative. Into the meeting, the reading was an elevated baseline plus a large FOMC chunk. After, the event chunk vanished — but the diffusive baseline stayed high because the banking stress was unscheduled and ongoing. Schematic, not a price chart.

What the deconstruction showed

The lesson is in the two clocks. Read as one number, March 2023 was just "high vol." Deconstructed, it was a high diffusive baseline (a real crisis) plus a fat event chunk (the Fed). Knowing the split told you what would happen on the 22nd: the FOMC premium would crush regardless of the decision, but the baseline wouldn't — because the thing driving the baseline wasn't on any calendar. Anyone who sold the whole reading as an "event crush" was short the wrong vol.

The lesson

When a real crisis and a scheduled event overlap, only the event crushes on schedule. Isolating the two tells you which part of the premium is about to vanish and which part is here to stay.

Do it live

This case study is free. To deconstruct around a live event you need the history — single names via ETF + Equities, full export via Everything.

See plans →

Educational content from Nations Indexes. Event facts (the SVB failure on Mar 10, 2023 and the Mar 22, 2023 FOMC 25 bp hike) are historical and verifiable. The figure is an illustrative recreation, not a price chart, and nothing here is investment advice.

×