Our Indexes

The world's leading
independent volatility indexes.

Five precision-engineered indexes that strip away the distortions of legacy vol measures — giving you a clean, real-time read on what options are actually pricing.

📊
VolDex®
A better way to measure option volatility
VolDex® focuses on the options that matter most—at-the-money (ATM) options with near-term expirations—giving a cleaner, more accurate view of implied volatility.

By isolating these highly liquid and actively traded contracts, VolDex avoids the distortion caused by less relevant, far out-of-the-money options. The result is a more precise snapshot of market expectations for price movement and investor sentiment—without the noise.
Explore VolDex®
📈
CallDex®
A clearer signal of bullish sentiment & expected volatility
CallDex® tracks the cost of out-of-the-money call options to gauge market sentiment for the next 30 days. It uses call options that are one standard deviation out-of-the-money to measure what investors are expecting in terms of both volatility and potential price direction.

Higher CallDex values generally suggest traders are anticipating bigger moves or a possible market rally. Lower values indicate a calmer outlook or reduced interest in upside exposure.
Explore CallDex®
📉
PutDex®
Focused on downside risk pricing
PutDex® delivers a clear, strike-specific measure of implied volatility by concentrating on one key data point: the normalized cost of a 30-day, one standard deviation out-of-the-money (OTM) SPY put option.

This approach isolates the segment of the options market most directly associated with downside protection, removing the noise from less relevant strike prices. The result precisely indicates market sentiment around tail risk, hedging activity, and bearish positioning.

By zeroing in on these put options—widely used by institutional investors to protect against market declines—PutDex offers valuable insight into how much investors are willing to pay to insure against losses over the next month.
Explore PutDex®
⚖️
RiskDex®
A Clear Signal of Expected Market Direction
RiskDex® measures investor sentiment by comparing the normalized cost of 30-day, one standard deviation out-of-the-money (OTM) SPY put and call options. This simple ratio reveals whether the market is more focused on downside protection or upside opportunity — offering a direct view of expected equity direction over the next month.

Unlike traditional volatility indexes, which reflect overall price movement, RiskDex highlights directional bias. A rising RiskDex indicates OTM put prices are increasing at a faster rate than OTM call prices and suggests growing concerns about potential declines; a lower reading signals confidence or complacency.

This makes RiskDex a valuable tool for traders and risk managers seeking clarity on where the market thinks it's headed—not just how volatile it might be.
Explore RiskDex®
🦅
TailDex®
A smarter signal for downside risk & tail hedging demand
TailDex® measures the price of deep out-of-the-money put options to assess bearish sentiment and demand for tail risk protection over the next 30 days. By focusing on puts that are three standard deviations OTM, it reflects how concerned traders are about a major downside move, often called a 'tail event'.

Higher TailDex values suggest rising demand for crash protection or increased fear of large selloffs. Lower values imply a calmer market tone and less urgency to hedge against tail risk.
Explore TailDex®

Crash Skew — March 2020

Case Study · Crash Skew

Free to read

Crash Skew — March 2020

The COVID crash is the textbook case where all three components fire at once — and the deconstruction shows you which one led.

Tier: ETF + EquitiesEvent: Feb–Mar 2020Underlying: SPYReading time: 6 min

If GameStop is the case where Slope broke its rule, March 2020 is the case where every component obeyed it — violently. A genuine crash lifts the level, steepens the put-skew, and blows out the tails all together. The value of deconstructing is seeing the order they move in.

The setup

The S&P 500 peaked on February 19, 2020 with an ordinary, gently put-tilted skew. Over the next five weeks COVID drove the fastest 30% drawdown on record — four market-wide circuit breakers between March 9 and 18, and a closing low on March 23, down 34% from the peak. The options surface didn't just rise; its whole shape changed.

Wed, Feb 19, 2020

Market tops. Normal skew: modest Level, gently negative Slope, mild Curvature.

Mon, Mar 9 → Wed, Mar 18

Four circuit breakers. Level explodes first; then Slope steepens hard (puts bid far above calls); then Curvature blows out as the deep tails get paid.

Mon, Mar 23

Closing low, −34% from peak; backstops landing. Curvature peaks; Level begins to roll over while Slope stays steep.

Late Mar → April

Recovery. Level normalizes, Curvature drains, Slope reverts toward its usual tilt.

What the deconstruction showed

A crash is a Level event first — the entire curve lifts as realized volatility surges. But the signature of fear is in the other two. Slope steepened well beyond its normal tilt: demand for downside protection swamped everything, so puts richened far faster than calls. Curvature spiked as the far-OTM puts — the genuine tail — got bid at a premium beyond even the steep linear skew, because the market was pricing not just "down" but "limit-down." Read as one "skew" number, March 2020 was simply enormous. Deconstructed, it was a Level shock that propagated into a Slope steepening and then a Curvature blowout — and Curvature is what TailDex® would have flagged.

Feb 19 — normal skewMid-March — crash skew
highlow IV OTM putsATMOTM calls Strike (log-moneyness) put wing bid hardest — steep Slope + high Curvature

Illustrative of the shape change, not a price chart. The crash lifted Level, steepened Slope (left side far higher), and raised Curvature (convex wings).

What the components flagged

The sequence is the lesson. Level moves first (vol rises), Slope second (puts outrun calls), Curvature last and biggest (the tail gets paid). If you only watch a blended skew number you miss that Curvature — the tail premium — peaked near the bottom. That's the component that prices crash protection, and the one that's most overpriced exactly when you're most tempted to buy it.

The trade the components pointed to

Each component has its structure. A Level shock is a long-vol/straddle story. A steep Slope is a put-spread or risk-reversal story. A spiking Curvature — the wings overpriced relative to the linear skew — is a butterfly/condor story: sell the rich tail against the body once the panic peaks. The discipline March 2020 teaches is to know which component is stretched before you pick the structure: shorting the Curvature blowout near the lows is a very different trade from being short the Level into the teeth of the move.

Do it live

This case study is free. To replay the component series across the crash, you need the historical deconstruction — an Everything capability (single names via ETF + Equities).

See plans →

Educational content from Nations Indexes. Event facts (peak/bottom, circuit breakers, drawdown, dates) are historical and verifiable. Component descriptions characterize how the options market priced risk; the figure is an illustrative recreation, not a price chart, and nothing here is investment advice.

×